Tag: Racing

2011 Formula One Turkish Grand Prix

Posted by – May 9, 2011

The fourth race of the 2011 Formula One season proved to be an exciting, if not slightly contrived, race after all was said and done. The defending World Driver’s Champion, Sebastian Vettel, for Red Bull Racing took the checkered flag in what looked like an effortless and perfectly executed weekend. Behind Sebastian Vettel the results were slightly different from what we had seen in the previous 3 races. Missing from this round were the initial (and surprising) pace of McLaren and Renault as well as the problems at Mercedes and Ferrari. While the front of the pack was reshuffled a bit, the back of the pack looked about the same with a few exceptions, including a sublime drive from a driver who’s stock must certainly be on the rise.

Red Bull Racing was finally able to lock out the top two positions in qualifying, although Webber was no match for Vettel in qualifying, or in the race for that matter. Vettel truly seems to be in a class of his own at the moment. Nico Rosberg was able to hoist his improving Mercedes GP car to the third step of the podium with Lewis Hamilton’s McLaren and Fernando Alonso’s Ferrari rounding out the top five in qualifying. Behind the top five were the usual players in their usual order (with some slight shuffling here and there). One exception was Kamui Kobayashi who’s Sauber failed to set a qualifying time and resulted in Kobayashi starting at the back of the grid. Luckily for Kobayashi he had posted times in practice well within 107% of the quickest time set in the first qualifying period which prompted the race stewards to allow him to start despite not setting a time.

The race start was rather tidy and saw a few position changes throughout the field mostly due to the differences in grip from the two starting lanes. Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso was finally able to get a good start and found himself not losing places as he has done in the previous races this season. One interesting insight I read after the race was in regards to the lack of chaos and crashes that have typically accompanied Grand Prix starts. The author surmised that with the passing opportunities afforded by the Drag Reduction System (DRS), Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS) and the Pirelli tires this season the driver’s no longer feel the desperation they once did to make up places at the start of the race. With the various changes this season, it seems the drivers are willing to wait and see how the various strategies play out in favor of trying to squeeze a rocketing F1 car into a tiny gap through the first corner. The result of this is that cars are no longer being taken out in first corner melees this season, which results in more cars battling throughout the race.

The race itself was a combination of confusing strategic wrangling and pointless “push to pass” scenarios using the Drag Reduction System (DRS). One exception to all of this was Kamui Kobayashi’s fantastic drive from dead last to finally ending up 10th and securing a Championship point for himself and Sauber. The usual players found themselves in more or less their usual places by the time the race ended. Sebastian Vettel drove a faultless race from Pole Position to the top step of podium. The Red Bull of Mark Webber finished second after battling Alonso’s ascendant Ferrari throughout the race finding themselves trading places a couple of times courtesy of the DRS “push to pass” button and tire degradation differences. A Red Bull 1-2 followed up with Ferrari finally capitalizing on their consistently high race pace rounded out the podium. The rest of the field crossed the line in the expected order with Renault, McLaren and Mercedes GP trading places to fill in the rest of the top 10 with Sebastian Buemi’s Torro Rosso and Kamui Kobayashi’s Sauber being the major exceptions.

The true star of this race was, and typically is, the Istanbul Park circuit. Like most great circuits there is one defining feature that sets them apart from the rest and in Istanbul this is Turn 8. Watching Formula One cars pull over 4Gs for 4-5 seconds while speeding around this 3-4 apex turn is phenomenal. Unfortunately the nature of this great track was slightly overshadowed by the contrived manner of passing being created by some of the rule changes this season. Particularly the Drag Reduction System (DRS). Perhaps a change in the DRS zone’s location or length could have alleviated some of the ridiculously easy passes we saw, but altogether this system is beginning to irritate some spectators, myself included. In season’s past when one driver passed another it meant something in the overall battle for the season’s championship. With the DRS the passes are no more meaningful than the ones we all make on our daily commutes. I would have rather seen the DRS zone moved between turns 7 and 8. Imagine the courage and skill required to effect a pass while setting up to go through turn 8! Now that would be a spectacle.

2011 Formula One Australian Grand Prix

Posted by – March 28, 2011

After an extended winter break, courtesy of political unrest in Bahrain, the 2011 Formula One season got off to a great start in Melbourne, Australia. The usual suspects were back in top form with reigning champions Red Bull Racing leading McLaren, Scuderia Ferrari and Lotus Renault in qualifying.

Sebastian Vettel of Red Bull Racing started on pole, led nearly every lap, and finished in first place to continue where he left off after winning the World Driver’s Championship in 2010. His teammate, Mark Webber did not fare so well in his home race managing to secure 5th place despite starting a promising 3rd. McLaren looked much more their speedy selves in the race compared to winter testing with Lewis Hamilton finishing second and Jenson Button putting in a strong performance despite managing only a 6th place finish likely due to a drive-through penalty incurred after passing Felipe Massa’s Ferrari off track. Fernando Alonso qualified well for Ferrari in 5th. A lack lustre start found Alonso falling from 5th to 9th place after the dust settled from the start. Fernando Alonso put in an impressive drive to eventually claw his way back to an impressive 4th place by the end of the race. His Ferrari teammate likewise gained a single position throughout the race to finish 7th. One standout from the usual players at the front of the grid was Lotus Renault’s Vitaly Petrov. A phenomenal start and flawless race landed Vitally on the 3rd step of the podium, a first for Vitaly, a first for a Russian and undoubtedly a relief for Lotus Renault whose championship dreams were surely being questioned with the (hopefully temporary) loss of Robert Kubica in an unrelated rally accident during winter testing.

The anticipation leading up to the race was heightened due to the rule changes enacted for the 2011 season. As is usually the case with each new season a number of changes to the rules that govern F1 have been enacted in the name of safety, cost-savings and the ever elusive goal of increasing overtaking in F1. For the 2011 season, two rules stand out and have been the topic of much debate in the off season. New for 2011 is the Drag Reduction System (DRS) and the re-introduction of the Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS), both of which aim to make overtaking easier.

The new DRS has been implemented to aid a following cars ability to overtake another at the end of a long straight. In my opinion this system is contrived and will most likely be relegated to the waste bin in the near future. The DRS is an artificial means to correct a problem that not everyone agrees even exists. There has long been a debate in F1 circles that it is too difficult for one car to overtake another in F1. While many casual observers (read: new, lucrative TV eyeballs) may find the apparent lack of overtaking boring the seasoned fan appreciates the difficulty and marvels at the skill and craftsmanship required to overtake in an F1 car. Time will tell if the DRS is successful or not, but I am not betting on it.

The second major technological change for this year is the re-inclusion of KERS. While KERS was available last year, the teams had all agreed not to use it. There are many reasons for the exclusion of this technology from last year’s cars, but I am glad that it is back for 2011. KERS allows the cars to store otherwise wasted kinetic energy in onboard batteries in order to provide 6 seconds worth of an additional 80 BPH per lap. I for one applaud the inclusion of this technology, but I am truly at a loss as to why the FIA has placed such strict limits on it’s application. For me Formula One is a wondrous mixture of technological wizardry and sublime driving skill. Placing limits on KERS only limits what the engineers and drivers in F1 are capable of. If left unchecked they would be able to extract enormous amounts of power from the kinetic energy of the car and would certainly be able to produce more than a mere 6 seconds of it per lap. I know that the limits have been put in place to save money, but I would rather see money saved in other areas to allow KERS to truly blossom.

All in all the season is off to an exciting start. The players are the same at the top and only time will tell if their order will follow from last year as well. Red Bull Racing look dominant, but McLaren, Ferrari and Lotus Renault do not seem too far off. As with every F1 season there are two races happening simultaneously, the race to develop one’s car at a blistering pace in hopes of outdoing one another on a technical level and the race between the drivers on the track on Sunday. Therein lies the true magic of F1, the combination of driving skill and engineering excellence.

How to save F1

Posted by – May 14, 2009

For those who haven’t been keeping with the wacky world of F1 politics, here is a short primer:

First you must understand the current geography of F1. There are three major bodies involved, the FIA (the rules), the FOM (the money) and the FOTA (the teams). All three would like to reduce the costs associated with operating an F1 team, but they don’t necessarily agree on how to go about it. Currently the FIA and FOM have put forth rules that will allow teams to operate based on one of two strategies. Either you get to have unlimited budgets but limited technical freedom, or you can have a limited budget with more freedom from technical regulations. This may seem like a best-of-both worlds strategy, but I don’t think that it is.

Imagine an F1 world where Renault, Ferrari, McLaren, BMW and Toyota are spending upwards of $200 million dollars a year to compete with teams who have budgets of only $60 million dollars. The big boys will be spending enormous amounts of money, constrained by an overburdened set of technical regulations while the budget teams may be able to beat them with their greater technical freedoms. I can’t imagine Ferrari would be to happy with Lola coming into F1 and being able to run circles around them for a fraction of the cost.

So why wouldn’t the big boys want to run under the currently proposed budget cap? Well, I suppose it doesn’t seem like a worthwhile effort to them. The big name teams are in F1 to express their technical expertise on the world’s grandest motorsports stage. This season in particular has proven to the F1 world that pouring money into your team does not guarantee success. BrawnGP and RBR have begun to run away with the championship lead while the traditional front-runners are floundering. It isn’t because BrawnGP or RBR have spent more money, it is because they are simply doing it better. They are what F1 is all about. A dedicated team of engineers, mechanics and drivers that have crafted a car capable of amazing feats of speed, endurance and reliability.

So how does one fix the current debacle? Easy, at least I think it is easy. Simply begin to transition the cost savings measures from a technical regulation model to a budget cap model. Over the course of a number of seasons allow the teams more technical freedom in exchange for reduced budget caps. But don’t start with $60 million dollars, perhaps that number is attainable in five or more years, but the teams simply cannot be forced into it next year.

One thing I would love to see in F1 is a removal of technical regulations regarding the engine, in conjunction with a reasonable overall budget cap. Currently the engines are 2.4 Liter V8s, limited to 18,000 RPM. Additionally, development on these engines has been frozen for 5 years. That doesn’t seem very F1 to me, F1 is all about development. I would rather the FIA mandate a maximum amount of fuel per race and a restrictor plate. Allow the teams to use any displacement and configuration they want to achieve maximum performance from a specific amount of fuel and air. The size of the restrictor plate should be equal to the current intake volume of the 2.4 Liter V8 running at 18,000 RPM. That way a team could use a 4 cylinder, turbocharged boxer engine if they felt that it provided the best performance, or a supercharged 1 liter, inline 3 cyclinder. The point being that engine development would be a primary differentiator in performance. One other added benefit would be that the teams would be focusing a massive engineering effort on efficiency and fuel economy, something that the motoring public would directly benefit from.

USF1

Posted by – February 24, 2009

via: Autoblog

USF1 has officially announced plans to compete in the 2010 Formula One series. There has been a bit of speculation throughout the interwebs of late regarding this, but nothing official until now. The team will be based in Charlotte, NC and they plan to operate more like a skunk-works than a traditional F1 team. Seems reminiscent of Super Aguri, which saw limited success with a tiny (comparitively) budget.

Of particular note is their intention to be open and accesible to their fans. Traditionally, F1 is a super-secret society, shielding all news and developments from prying eyes. It will be interesting to see just how open they will be.

Amazing F1 Battle!

Posted by – November 6, 2007


Rain Heroes from FUROBOT on Vimeo.

F1 USGP

Posted by – June 18, 2007

Fernando Alonso at the 2007 USGP

Formula 1 racing returned to the United States this weekend. While always enjoyable, this race typically leaves quite a bit to be desired. The design of the track forces the teams to set their cars up for high speed runs through a portion of the famed Indianapolis Motor Speedway. While it is great to see these marvels of engineering hurtling down the track, I prefer to watch them battling through the infield. Unfortunately, the infield racing at Indy is less than spectacular. The trade-offs the teams have to make to achieve high speeds down the straights mean that they have to remove a majority of the aerodynamics that provide the necessary down-force for high speeds throughout the rest of the track. I think it would behoove the FIA to find a track in the United States that better lends itself to the spectacle that is F1 racing. They need a more balanced track. If I wanted to watch cars going fast in straight lines, I would watch an IRL race, or even NASCAR, but I don’t care about that kind of racing. I want to see cars slicing and dicing through tight corners and high speed arcs, not flying down a straight road.

F1 Going Green?

Posted by – May 28, 2007

The governing body of Formula 1 (F1), the FIA, has prescribed a roadmap for engine development in F1 that would have the teams use smaller engines running on bio-fuels in the 2010 racing season. This was decided as a result of the FIA’s decision to have the research and development of the F1 teams provide a more direct impact on the automotive industry. F1 teams have enormous development budgets, if even a small percentage of this is spent helping to increase fuel mileage, or alleviate the dependence on fossil fuels, then I am all for it.

Hopefully, this decision by the FIA will lead to some significant advancements in the automotive industry. I for one think that this is definitely the direction the FIA should be taking. In addition to these changes, I would like to see a few more changes to the rules that I think would benefit the driving public even more:

  1. Decrease fuel cell size to a point where 4-5 pit stops would be required to get through a typical race with current fuel mileage ratios. This would help to increase the miles/km that the cars achieve in order to reduce the number of pit stops that a driver must make to get through a race.
  2. Reinstate a number of the electronic assistance devices that have been removed from the cars. This would help the motoring public immensely by providing safer cars as a result of advancements in traction control.
  3. Remove the mandate of the use of the V-8 engine configuration, but keep the displacement restrictions in place. By allowing the teams to use any engine configuration imaginable they would be using their enormous development budgets to figure out which engine they can squeeze the most power out of.
  4. Allow hybrid technologies in F1 racing! Notice that I said “allow” not mandate. If an F1 team can develop a car that performs better while utilizing some hybrid technologies, then why not allow it? If they decide that storing energy from regenerative braking is worth the extra weight of a dual drive system and batteries, then why not let them do it?

FIA GT3

Posted by – May 23, 2007

FIA GT3 Ferrari's in Bucharest - May, 2007

Every dream that I have ever had about winning the lottery has culminated in me owning and racing in a Gran Touring racing series such as the FIA GT3 series. I have seen a number of GT races throughout the years and they are awesome! I love watching cars that, if I had enough money, I could go buy and race myself. What sets the FIA GT3 series apart from the GT races I have seen in the past is the makes and models of cars that race in the FIA GT3 series, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Maserati and Porsche to name a few. While I have seen many of these cars in the various races I have seen, they have not been as prevalent as they are in the FIA GT3 series.

For a little FIA GT3 eye candy, check out this gallery from the Bucharest race in May 2007, courtesy of Autoblog.

F1 Weekend

Posted by – July 6, 2006

Oh how I enjoy Formula One. I am not an insane fanatic of sports. I enjoy Football (U.S.A. style) and racing, especially F1. I also watch basketball, soccer, rugby, and a few other sports as well. I typically do not plan my life around any sporting events though. I will, however, record an interesting football game occasional. The one sport that I will plan my Sunday around is F1. So, if you have nothing to do on Sunday, watch the Grand Prix du Canada, I know I will.

Formula 1

Posted by – May 22, 2005

I just watched the Grand Prix de Monaco, and I can’t get over how amazing those cars are. They are quite simply the absolute apex of automotive engineering. I find it hard to believe that man is able to engineer a machine that is capable of going as fast as these cars go and for as long. They traveled a total of 260.5km (162 miles) in 1 hour and 45 minutes. That works out to an average speed of 148kph or 92mph. The engines in these cars are 3.0 liter V-10′s that operate at up to 20,000rpm. Now compare this with the average car that operates around 5,000rpm and you can see that these engines revolve an amazing four times faster. The cars produce so much downforce at speed that they would literally be able to drive on the ceiling of a tunnel. Absolutely amazing!

One criticism that I have of Formula 1, and of racing in general, is that there is little emphasis on fuel economy. The FIA (the governing body for F1) has made a number of rule changes coming into the 2005 season, but none of them are aimed at improving fuel economy. The current generation of F1 cars gets, at best, .66 liters per kilometer (3.5 miles per gallon). Now, I am not a proponent of radical rule changes altering the nature of F1 racing, but I would like to see some minor changes to help improve fuel economy. I look at most forms of racing as, first, a very exciting sport but then as a testbed for automotive development. F1 has been absolutely instrumental in advancing the safety of vehicles, increasing horsepower, advancing aerodynamics and improving handling. The budgets of the top F1 teams probably equal budgets of most major automakers. I think it is time, especially considering the current strain on oil reserves, for F1 to pour some development money into improving fuel economy.